Companies continuing to do business with Russia during the war

Huntn

Whatwerewe talk'n about?
Site Donor
Posts
5,282
Reaction score
5,222
Location
The Misty Mountains


Paywall, user browser reader mode if required:

Most American companies get that. Some 400 U.S. and other multinational firms have pulled out of Russia, either permanently or temporarily, according to Yale’s Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, who has kept the authoritative list of corporate actions in Russia. Oil companies (BP, Shell, ExxonMobil) and tech companies (Dell, IBM, Apple, Google, Facebook, Twitter) led the way, and many others (McDonald’s, Starbucks, Coca-Cola) eventually followed.
But, according to Sonnenfeld, there are, at the other extreme, 33 companies (as of Wednesday afternoon) that form a “hall of shame,” defying demands that they exit Russia or reduce their activities there.

“They are funding the Russian war machine, and they are undermining the whole idea of the sanctions," Sonnenfeld told me. “The whole idea is to freeze up civil society, to get people out on the streets and outraged. They’re undermining an effective resolution” and increasing the likelihood of continued bloodshed.
Those who want to stop Russia’s murderous attack against Ukraine should stop investing in or buying the products of these companies.
Koch Industries, whose owners gave to right-wing causes for years, is now financing Putin’s war. The people who make Brawny paper towels, Dixie cups, Quilted Northern toilet paper, Vanity Fair napkins and Georgia-Pacific lumber are abetting the spilling of Ukrainians’ blood.
Like Reebok shoes? They’re being used to stomp on Ukraine. Authentic Brands Group, which also owns Aeropostale, Eddie Bauer, Brooks Brothers and Nine West, among others, is in the hall of shame.

Before you bite into a Cinnabon (or Carvel ice cream, Schlotzsky’s sandwich or Auntie Anne’s pretzel) consider that parent company Focus Brands is taking a bite out of democracy in Ukraine.
So is Subway. While selling you the All-American Club, it’s giving Ukrainians the Cold-Cock Combo by refusing to cut loose its 446 Russian franchises.
Several other household brands — Truvia and Diamond Crystal salt (Cargill), Avon cosmetics (Natura), LG appliances, ASUS laptops, Mission tortillas (Gruma) and Pirelli tires — are produced by companies on the shameful list.
Are you or your mutual fund invested in Halliburton, Baker Hughes or Schlumberger? Then you should know that these oil-services companies could deal a huge blow to Putin’s ability to wage war — but they choose profit instead.
Let’s name and shame all the others among the 33: advertising firms BBDO, DDB and Omnicom; accountant Baker Tilly; industrial companies Air Liquide, Air Products, Greif, IPG Photonics, Linde, Mettler Toledo, Nalco and Rockwool; French hotelier Accor and retailers Auchan, Decathlon and Leroy Merlin; German wholesaler Metro; cloud service Cloudflare; International Paper; and Sweden’s Oriflame Cosmetics.


An additional 72 multinationals have made only partial pullbacks from Russia, such as reducing current operations or holding off on new investments — actions Sonnenfeld calls “very questionable” and “smokescreens.” Included here: Dunkin Donuts, General Mills, Mondelez (Oreos and other Nabisco products), candymaker Mars, Procter & Gamble, Yum Brands (Pizza Hut, Taco Bell), Hilton, Hyatt and Marriott.
All these businesses could be doing more to stop Putin’s savagery and war crimes. Because they won’t, we all should do more to stop them. Go to Sonnenfeld’s website via Yale’s School of Management to make sure you aren’t funding the businesses that are funding Putin’s war machine — and reward the vast majority of companies that share Zelensky’s belief that peace is more important than profit.
 

MarkusL

Power User
Posts
128
Reaction score
333
Oil companies (BP, Shell, ExxonMobil) and tech companies (Dell, IBM, Apple, Google, Facebook, Twitter) led the way
Let's keep an eye on BP though. They say they are not signing new contracts, but they are still following through on existing deals and just last week they brought a shipload of Russian jet fuel into Gävle, Sweden. Our politicians are not getting off their asses to ban oil imports from Russia, so the dock workers union has now come up with another solution. They have announced a labor action blockading the loading, unloading, towing and mooring of ships owned by Russians, departing to Russia, arriving from Russia, or carrying Russian cargo. Under Swedish labor law this blockade can only take effect after a notice period which expires on March 28, but the union has announced they will not respect the notice period. The parties to any dispute would be the union and the ports, not the customers of the ports. This means that in order to enforce the notice period it is the ports that would need to take the union to court, and the union is saying openly that they don't expect the ports to smear themselves like that.
 

Eric

Mama's lil stinker
Posts
11,390
Reaction score
21,965
Location
California
Instagram
Main Camera
Sony
Doesn't the US Government have the ability to freeze those assets should they so choose? We should be dropping the hammer on anyone here continuing to do business with them in any way.
 

AG_PhamD

Elite Member
Posts
1,049
Reaction score
979
I like the course of action Pfizer has taken with Russia. Pharmaceutical/Biomed companies are in a bit of a hard place choosing between condemning the violence perpetuated by the Putin regime and ethical responsibility of providing healthcare resources to the civilian population. As a result, Pfizer has chosen to cease investments in Russia, cancel all new clinical trial in Russia, stop existing recruitment of ongoing trials, and most notably donate all profits from Russian sales to the Ukrainian humanitarian effort.

I would love to see other companies in this industry take a similar tact.
 
Top Bottom
1 2