Here comes the police state: Protesters held on $1 million bail

Thomas Veil

Thread Starter
Moderator
Staff member
I Voted
Posts
734
Reaction score
1,362
It’s “lock dissenters up and throw away the key” time. At least to this prosecutor, and whatever judge went along with it

$1 million bail set for Lancaster protesters decried as 'blatantly unconstitutional'

Bail was set Tuesday at $1 million for several protesters arrested during demonstrations against a fatal police shooting in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, a move decried by many including the state's lieutenant governor, who called it "blatantly unconstitutional."
Lancaster police arrested 12 adults and one juvenile after about 100 people gathered outside the city's police station Sunday following the police killing of Ricardo Munoz, 27, who authorities say chased an officer with a knife. Police said the demonstration devolved into a riot that caused damage to the station, vandalism to local businesses and a small fire, and officers used "chemical munitions" to disperse the crowd....
The adults face charges including conspiracy to commit arson, riot, institutional vandalism and disorderly conduct. One has been charged with carrying a concealed weapon without a permit. The 13 defendants range from 16 to 43 years old and live in Lancaster and surrounding communities....
“The $1 million cash bail orders for several young Black Lives Matter protesters last night is an egregious and unacceptable abuse of the bail system," Reggie Shuford, executive director of the ACLU of Pennsylvania, said in a statement. "Cash bail should never be used to deter demonstrators and chill speech."
So if this is bail, what’s the punishment if found guilty? Hanging?
 

JayMysteri0

Site Champ
Posts
719
Reaction score
1,322

SuperMatt

Site Champ
I Voted
Posts
573
Reaction score
935
Hmm... although the shooting of the man with a knife might have been justified, it appears minorities in Lancaster, PA had plenty of other reasons to protest.
 

JayMysteri0

Site Champ
Posts
719
Reaction score
1,322
There is a pattern forming...
Attorney General William Barr expressed frustration with some local and state prosecutors' handling of riot-related crimes, telling top Justice Department prosecutors that he wants them to be aggressive in bringing charges related to protest violence, including exploring using a rarely used sedition law, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Since taking office in 2019, Barr has lashed out at a group of left-leaning district attorneys in cities around the country who have sought to change the way they prosecute low-level drug and other crimes.

It's a theme that has gained traction in conservative media, which Barr follows closely, and he is known to focus on the issue from time to time.
Still, some federal prosecutors were taken aback last week when the attorney general brought up the possibility of charging violent protesters with sedition, which makes it a crime to conspire to overthrow the US government.
 

Thomas Veil

Thread Starter
Moderator
Staff member
I Voted
Posts
734
Reaction score
1,362
Attorney General William Barr expressed frustration...telling top Justice Department prosecutors that he wants them to be aggressive in bringing charges related to protest violence, including exploring using a rarely used sedition law, according to a person familiar with the matter.
People in glass houses... 😡
 

SuperMatt

Site Champ
I Voted
Posts
573
Reaction score
935
Top Bottom