Trump asks judge to recuse himself in suit against H. Clinton

[Cmaier]

Trump asks judge to recuse from racketeering suit against Hillary Clinton — POLITICO

Trump lawyers say the Bill Clinton-appointed jurist shouldn't handle the case over Russia 2016 election claims.

apple.news

The judge in question is the judge who handled the case against me. I like him.

 

[Alli]

And as with all his other suits, it doesn’t appear he has a leg to stand on.

Don’t you find it interesting/amusing/horrifying that he will ask for this judge’s recusal based on the possibility that he has/had a relationship with the former president and former First Lady, but is fine with Clarence Thomas.

 

[Edd]

Trump asks judge to recuse from racketeering suit against Hillary Clinton — POLITICO

Trump lawyers say the Bill Clinton-appointed jurist shouldn't handle the case over Russia 2016 election claims.

apple.news

The judge in question is the judge who handled the case against me. I like him.

You going to expand on that or.......

 

[Cmaier]

You going to expand on that or.......

I represented a company that won a patent lawsuit. Woman who owned the company that had sued my client alleged that I conspired with a bunch of people, including her own attorneys, to somehow violate her civil rights and prevent her from winning. Also something about a rock thrown through her window. (I was on the opposite coast at all times, so wasn’t me). She was either asking for $500 million or $60 million depending on which document you looked at.

 

[Yoused]

alleged that I conspired with a bunch of people, including her own attorneys, to somehow violate her civil rights and prevent her from winning

Seems like there are a lot of frivolous/ridiculous filings in our courts. I wonder if there is a practical way to rein that BS in, by, say, imposing some sort of automatic semi-punitive compensation upon the plaintiff for wasting the court's time.

 

[Cmaier]

Seems like there are a lot of frivolous/ridiculous filings in our courts. I wonder if there is a practical way to rein that BS in, by, say, imposing some sort of automatic semi-punitive compensation upon the plaintiff for wasting the court's time.

I don’t think there really are that many. Lawyers have an ethical duty not to file frivolous actions, and most don’t do it. The problem in this case is the lady filed the lawsuit without a lawyer. (Which was another problem for her - corporations aren’t allowed to do that)

 

[Cmaier]

Poor Donald.

 

[Yoused]

Poor Donald.

Too many difficult words

Recusal cannot be based on unsupported, irrational or highly tenuous speculation.​

not enough pictures. Is he trying to provoke the ShitGibbon? An unmistakable sign of prejudice.