Our delicate internet

[dada_dave]

The invisible seafaring industry that keeps the internet afloat

How one crew risked radiation, storms, and currents to save Japan from digital isolation.

www.theverge.com

There are about 800,000 miles of these skinny tubes crisscrossing the Earth’s oceans, representing nearly 600 different systems, according to the industry tracking organization TeleGeography. The cables are buried near shore, but for the vast majority of their length, they just sit amid the gray ooze and alien creatures of the ocean floor, the hair-thin strands of glass at their center glowing with lasers encoding the world’s data.

If, hypothetically, all these cables were to simultaneously break, modern civilization would cease to function.

Fortunately, there is enough redundancy in the world’s cables to make it nearly impossible for a well-connected country to be cut off, but cable breaks do happen. On average, they happen every other day, about 200 times a year. The reason websites continue to load, bank transfers go through, and civilization persists is because of the thousand or so people living aboard 20-some ships stationed around the world, who race to fix each cable as soon as it breaks.

“We’re all happy to spend billions to build new cables, but we’re not really thinking about how we’re going to look after them,” said Mike Constable, the former CEO of Huawei Marine Networks, who gave a presentation on the state of the maintenance fleet at an industry event in Singapore last year. “If you talk to the ship operators, they say it’s not sustainable anymore.”

He pointed to a case last year when four of Vietnam’s five subsea cables went down, slowing the internet to a crawl. The cables hadn’t fallen victim to some catastrophic event. It was just the usual entropy of fishing, shipping, and technical failure. But with nearby ships already busy on other repairs, the cables didn’t get fixed for six months. (One promptly broke again.)

But perhaps a greater threat to the industry’s long-term survival is that the people, like the ships, are getting old. In a profession learned almost entirely on the job, people take longer to train than ships to build.

 

[rdrr]

The invisible seafaring industry that keeps the internet afloat

How one crew risked radiation, storms, and currents to save Japan from digital isolation.

www.theverge.com

Seriously I am surprised that when you put in a url, and knowing what I know, get a page back in a few millisecond. It is something no one really thinks about, but takes it for granted that it works like a utility, a-la electricity.

For example this is a network map of our main website that recently moved to a hosted cloud service. We monitor its pathways, loss, latency, etc from on site and cloud pops in Boston and NYC. Even on campus it will take different network paths. Note: I have redacted the IP address from the nodes it passes through our network, the ISP(s), and IP of the website.

 

[dada_dave]

A very different way our internet is delicate:

The Man Who Killed Google Search

This is the story of how Google Search died, and the people responsible for killing it. The story begins on February 5th 2019, when Ben Gomes, Google’s head of search, had a problem. Jerry Dischler, then the VP and General Manager of Ads at Google, and Shiv Venkataraman, then

www.wheresyoured.at

A touch polemical perhaps, but not without merit.

 

[Cmaier]

A very different way our internet is delicate:

The Man Who Killed Google Search

This is the story of how Google Search died, and the people responsible for killing it. The story begins on February 5th 2019, when Ben Gomes, Google’s head of search, had a problem. Jerry Dischler, then the VP and General Manager of Ads at Google, and Shiv Venkataraman, then

www.wheresyoured.at

A touch polemical perhaps, but not without merit.

I tried to read this last night, but it was written so poorly that I couldn’t follow it.

 

[dada_dave]

I tried to read this last night, but it was written so poorly that I couldn’t follow it.

As I said, it is a bit polemical and strident with perhaps the strong emotions overriding good structure. The summary is that Google after 2019 pursued enshittification of search in pursuit of growing ad revenue. They kicked out the guy (Gomes) who had been instrumental in developing Google’s search, basically one of the original Google employees, in favor of a guy (Raghavan) who has seemingly failed upwards from Yahoo to Google.

 

[Cmaier]

As I said, it is a bit polemical and strident with perhaps the strong emotions overriding good structure. The summary is that Google after 2019 pursued enshittification of search in pursuit of growing ad revenue. They kicked out the guy (Gomes) who had been instrumental in developing Google’s search, basically one of the original Google employees, in favor of a guy (Raghavan) who has seemingly failed upwards from Yahoo to Google.

Yeah, i got that, but i was looking for a better story given the zillion words he dedicated to saying not much more than your summary