So…they made the choice that they didn’t want kids and went on the pill. (That happened to a friend of mine in college as well.) But that choice failed them.Stats? No. But my wife's friend has 2 pill babies so I know it isn't 100%.
So…they made the choice that they didn’t want kids and went on the pill. (That happened to a friend of mine in college as well.) But that choice failed them.Stats? No. But my wife's friend has 2 pill babies so I know it isn't 100%.
I seriously doubt that is ever the plan. At least that's not what I witnessed while holding the hand of two different friends who had abortions since the men who got them into the predicament bailed on taking ownership of their part in the deed. It's a gut wrenching procedure that I don't think any woman desires to find herself in.I just don't think abortion should be used as a form of birth control.
Why would any woman prefer surgical abortion as a form of birth control? It's more expensive (not including the time and cost of travel from states that don't provide it) and is riskier, even though it's safe in good hands. But all the non-surgical options are fallible, and women are often not aware they're pregnant well into the first trimester. Plus, as I said, there are maternal and fetal conditions that only can be addressed by abortion. And what about the states that are considering defining life as beginning at conception, which would technically make several forms of contraception illegal?Agree 100%.
I just don't think abortion should be used as a form of birth control.
The “abortion used as birth control” is a worn-out anti-abortion trope. Those repeating it may not realize that, but the idea is to paint those having abortions as heartless people who would rather kill a baby than use a condom.I’ve never seen one thing that suggested anyone uses abortion as birth control. Personally, I don’t believe anyone does. But it’s 100% effective, while birth control is not. Ever looked at the stats on pregnancies to women on the pill?
The “abortion used as birth control” is a worn-out anti-abortion trope. Those repeating it may not realize that, but the idea is to paint those having abortions as heartless people who would rather kill a baby than use a condom.
I didn’t think you were trying to say that. But it has been the point of such a statement from the anti-abortion coalition in the past, which is why I thought it bore a mention.That is absolutely not what I am saying. But happens sometimes. People get lazy or drunk and hope the odds work in their favor. (For the record, I have been there. Had a few long weeks a couple of times and it is certainly no fun.) No I seriously doubt people would rather kill a baby vs using a condom.
But your choice of words is interesting. Your post seems to indicate that you think it is killing a baby, which is the position of the anti-abortion side.
What I find interesting is that a majority of people think overturning RvW will outlaw abortions across the country. It does not.
Well, there some really ugly stories in which strict late-term abortion bans offer the worst possible outcomes. Abortions after 20 weeks are extremely uncommon, and those that happen because the woman could not make up her mind are vanishing rare. These bans are just plain stupid, and "life of the mother" is a wrong metric.(Life of the mother excepted.)
What I find interesting is that a majority of people think overturning RvW will outlaw abortions across the country. It does not.
That is absolutely not what I am saying. But happens sometimes. People get lazy or drunk and hope the odds work in their favor. (For the record, I have been there. Had a few long weeks a couple of times and it is certainly no fun.) No I seriously doubt people would rather kill a baby vs using a condom.
But your choice of words is interesting. Your post seems to indicate that you think it is killing a baby, which is the position of the anti-abortion side.
And don't forget, I am not opposed to abortion. I do think if you can't make a decision by 24 weeks (which is more than reasonable and longer than many other countries) , then you can put it up for adoption. (Life of the mother excepted.)
What I find interesting is that a majority of people think overturning RvW will outlaw abortions across the country. It does not.
I think this is an opportunity for the Dems if they don't squander it to change some statehouses in Red states.
Because half the states have trigger laws ready to go into effect if it’s overturned.What I find interesting is that a majority of people think overturning RvW will outlaw abortions across the country. It does not.
Because half the states have trigger laws ready to go into effect if it’s overturned.
And let’s face it, does it really matter if states like TX are going to refuse to allow its citizens to leave the state so they can get an abortion elsewhere? Does it really matter if states like FL willpersecuteprosecute a mother who has a miscarriage?
Oklahoma governor warns tribes not to create abortion havens
Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt (R) on Sunday warned Native American tribes not to create abortion safe havens if Roe v. Wade is overturned and his state enacts a near-total ban on abortions. Stitt told …thehill.com
When the crazy “People of Praise” cult was brought up, the Republicans screamed and cried that those asking questions were being mean to Amy because of her faith.Time for the facepalm borne from creepiness & faux shock
https://www.twitter.com/i/web/status/1533817703734968320/
https://www.twitter.com/i/web/status/1533802942708559873/
Meanwhile, he’s hard at work blocking legislation to protect little kids from being gunned down. Priorities.McConnell used the incident to call on the House to pass legislation increasing protection for Supreme Court Justices and their families.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.