Couldn't be happier.
Here's the thing; his defenders, and maybe even detractors who are worried about free speech, will argue that this is punishing people for their speech. Depending on who's making the argument, there's definitely room for debate and discussion about what is or isn't protected free speech, should someone be held liable for their words, etc.
All of those are valid arguments. But my whole thing is, I don't know where the line should be, but I do think that if what Alex Jones did regarding Sandy Hook doesn't cross it, then there is no line at all.
It's like one of those situations where you don't know what the answer is, you just know what it isn't. All I know is that if any laws are going to exist at all regarding what someone can be held accountable for saying, Alex Jones should be one of the easiest cases to show why such laws are needed. Trump's rally, for instance, where I wouldn't be able to draw a clear line. Alex Jones making tons of cash off of lying about a traumatic event the survivors were trying to recover from, which in itself put people living quiet lives in danger? Yeah, if that doesn't merit a laws holding people accountable in some fashion, then there should be no such laws against saying anything at all, including yelling fire in a burning building.
In any decently-run society, Alex Jones would have been broke and castigated and ridiculed long ago, driven into bankruptcy and obscurity before he could have even made an impact on the Sandy Hook families in the first place. But we're definitely not anywhere close to that happening, so this is the next best thing.
It really is parallel to a lot of things going on with Trump - any individual case he's involved in can be dissected and debated, some more than others - but on the whole, it's long past the point of "if he's not going to be held accountable, then who the hell ever will? If this isn't a crime, then what the hell is? If this isn't disqualifying from public office, what the he hell is?"