The Republican Agenda 2021 and Forward

Yoused

up
Posts
5,624
Reaction score
8,944
Location
knee deep in the road apples of the 4 horsemen
we need to use RICO laws to go after it.
Actually, some 8 or so years ago, the FCC included municipal broadband in their net neutrality regulation package, preventing states from pulling this sort of shenanigan. Pai reversed most of what they did, but it should be possible now to roll back the rollback.
 

Chew Toy McCoy

Pleb
Site Donor
Posts
7,559
Reaction score
11,811
Uh oh. Obama issued a "not acceptable" towards Republicans using the filibuster to block voting rights reform bills. Nothing stings the party of Trump more than a "not acceptable" hurled at them. I can't believe Obama lost his shit like that. It's a dark day for Democrats. I hope he apologizes so we can start rebuilding the respect Republicans have shown Democrats for the past several decades.
 

Chew Toy McCoy

Pleb
Site Donor
Posts
7,559
Reaction score
11,811
Uh oh. Obama issued a "not acceptable" towards Republicans using the filibuster to block voting rights reform bills. Nothing stings the party of Trump more than a "not acceptable" hurled at them. I can't believe Obama lost his shit like that. It's a dark day for Democrats. I hope he apologizes so we can start rebuilding the respect Republicans have shown Democrats for the past several decades.

Rumors are starting to circulate that Biden plans to follow in Obama’s lead with an even more divisive “not cool, man”. So I guess Democrats are just throwing decorum out the window with these insults. What a bloodbath. Thank God we have Manchin there to hopefully calm things down with his pragmatic beliefs that haven’t been grounded in reality for at least 12 years.
 

Chew Toy McCoy

Pleb
Site Donor
Posts
7,559
Reaction score
11,811
I find it odd that the Republicans are calling the voting bill a Democrat power grab and the party of "not acceptable" is largely letting them get away with it.

Which of the following could be considered a power grab.

1. Helping people to vote
2. Preventing people from voting
 

SuperMatt

Site Master
Posts
7,862
Reaction score
15,004
I find it odd that the Republicans are calling the voting bill a Democrat power grab and the party of "not acceptable" is largely letting them get away with it.

Which of the following could be considered a power grab.

1. Helping people to vote
2. Preventing people from voting
They brought John Thune (R) onto the News Hour last night to defend the Republican blocking of the bill. He claimed it was about States’ rights. He also claimed there were things in there specifically meant to help Democrats, but I don’t think he named any.

 

thekev

Elite Member
Posts
1,110
Reaction score
1,674
They brought John Thune (R) onto the News Hour last night to defend the Republican blocking of the bill. He claimed it was about States’ rights. He also claimed there were things in there specifically meant to help Democrats, but I don’t think he named any.



He's a jackass, much like the rest of them. They didn't care about their "states' rights" nonsense for the previous four years. They rediscovered it now, because it happens to benefit them again. Part of the problem is that disingenuous double-speak seems to be considered acceptable conduct.
 

Pumbaa

Verified Warthog
Posts
2,564
Reaction score
4,220
Location
Kingdom of Sweden
They brought John Thune (R) onto the News Hour last night to defend the Republican blocking of the bill. He claimed it was about States’ rights. He also claimed there were things in there specifically meant to help Democrats, but I don’t think he named any.


Ah, yes, it was about “States’ rights”. Just like the Civil War. /s
 

Chew Toy McCoy

Pleb
Site Donor
Posts
7,559
Reaction score
11,811
They brought John Thune (R) onto the News Hour last night to defend the Republican blocking of the bill. He claimed it was about States’ rights. He also claimed there were things in there specifically meant to help Democrats, but I don’t think he named any.



I think it would help if we got a complete list of the MANY new state laws and rules being proposed or passed and what was there previously. Big bonus if we could get an explanation for why each was changed or should be.

Beyond that, all we know is Trump lost and now Republicans seem to have the single purpose of changing the rules. Also should be noted, after no massive voter fraud has been found.
 

Huntn

Whatwerewe talk'n about?
Site Donor
Posts
5,289
Reaction score
5,233
Location
The Misty Mountains
I find it odd that the Republicans are calling the voting bill a Democrat power grab and the party of "not acceptable" is largely letting them get away with it.

Which of the following could be considered a power grab.

1. Helping people to vote
2. Preventing people from voting
Voters Rights? GOP: Hell No we are not going to discuss it! That would be ….Federalizing voting!!! 😑 :unsure:
 

Chew Toy McCoy

Pleb
Site Donor
Posts
7,559
Reaction score
11,811
Voters Rights? GOP: Hell No we are not going to discuss it! That would be ….Federalizing voting!!! 😑 :unsure:

They have the right to stop you from voting. It’s part of the 2nd amendment that was written in invisible ink. I’m sure Cyber Ninjas will be presenting proof of that any day now.
 

Chew Toy McCoy

Pleb
Site Donor
Posts
7,559
Reaction score
11,811
Some fun facts quoted in a Salon article.

The 50 Democratic senators who support the For the People Act (or least Sen. Joe Manchin's compromise proposal keeping some key elements of the bill while excluding others) represent 43 million more Americans than the 50 Republican senators who oppose it, according to data compiled by Alex Tausanovitch of the Center for American Progress. Yet because of the 60-vote requirement to pass most legislation, 41 Republican senators representing just 21 percent of the country can block the bill from moving forward, even though it's supported by 68 percent of the public, according to recent polling.

As one Congressman put it, it's ironic that Republicans are using their favorite minority congressional voting tool to block the rights of minority voters.

So for Democrats playing the home game, Republicans win whether in the majority or the minority. When they aren't forcing their legislation through they're forcing their obstruction through.
 

SuperMatt

Site Master
Posts
7,862
Reaction score
15,004
Some fun facts quoted in a Salon article.

The 50 Democratic senators who support the For the People Act (or least Sen. Joe Manchin's compromise proposal keeping some key elements of the bill while excluding others) represent 43 million more Americans than the 50 Republican senators who oppose it, according to data compiled by Alex Tausanovitch of the Center for American Progress. Yet because of the 60-vote requirement to pass most legislation, 41 Republican senators representing just 21 percent of the country can block the bill from moving forward, even though it's supported by 68 percent of the public, according to recent polling.

As one Congressman put it, it's ironic that Republicans are using their favorite minority congressional voting tool to block the rights of minority voters.

So for Democrats playing the home game, Republicans win whether in the majority or the minority. When they aren't forcing their legislation through they're forcing their obstruction through.
Democrats worried about the GOP forcing legislation through if they kill the filibuster should look honestly at what the GOP did when they had power: nothing. Their entire strategy is to block everything and pass nothing. The one thing they will actually do is cut taxes for billionaires… and they don’t need a supermajority for that because it’s considered reconciliation. So kill the filibuster now and start implementing the will of 70% of Americans instead of the will of 50 old white dudes from the middle of nowhere.
 

Chew Toy McCoy

Pleb
Site Donor
Posts
7,559
Reaction score
11,811
Democrats worried about the GOP forcing legislation through if they kill the filibuster should look honestly at what the GOP did when they had power: nothing. Their entire strategy is to block everything and pass nothing. The one thing they will actually do is cut taxes for billionaires… and they don’t need a supermajority for that because it’s considered reconciliation. So kill the filibuster now and start implementing the will of 70% of Americans instead of the will of 50 old white dudes from the middle of nowhere.

What the self-defeatist moderates say is once the Republicans have power again they'll just reverse what the Democrats forced through by killing the filibuster. Really? How's that reversing the ACA going? (although that is a bad example because beyond rhetoric Republicans actually prefer it over anything else being proposed that is short of "screw everybody!").

What you do is force popular legislation through and then kick back and laugh as Republicans try to reverse it or word salad try to justify the attempt.
 

SuperMatt

Site Master
Posts
7,862
Reaction score
15,004
What the self-defeatist moderates say is once the Republicans have power again they'll just reverse what the Democrats forced through by killing the filibuster. Really? How's that reversing the ACA going? (although that is a bad example because beyond rhetoric Republicans actually prefer it over anything else being proposed that is short of "screw everybody!").

What you do is force popular legislation through and then kick back and laugh as Republicans try to reverse it or word salad try to justify the attempt.
Exactly!!! We saw this happen already when the Dems passed the COVID relief bill. The GOP members all voted against it, but then started tweeting to their constituents “look what I did for you up in Washington!” as if they voted to pass the thing. There are a number of Democratic priorities that are popular with close to a supermajority of Americans … but the GOP is blocking them. There is no way in hell they will repeal stuff that is popular after the fact.
 

Chew Toy McCoy

Pleb
Site Donor
Posts
7,559
Reaction score
11,811
I said in another post a while back that we should allow Republicans to sign a letter that they are just going to unilaterally block anything Democrats try to do and then they don’t even have to show up.

I would like to add to that, that we should also allow them to sign a letter saying they are going to respond to anything and everything Democrats are trying to do with “Democrat power grab”, “woke”, or “socialist”. That way they can both not show up and also STFU.
 

Huntn

Whatwerewe talk'n about?
Site Donor
Posts
5,289
Reaction score
5,233
Location
The Misty Mountains
I said in another post a while back that we should allow Republicans to sign a letter that they are just going to unilaterally block anything Democrats try to do and then they don’t even have to show up.

I would like to add to that, that we should also allow them to sign a letter saying they are going to respond to anything and everything Democrats are trying to do with “Democrat power grab”, “woke”, or “socialist”. That way they can both not show up and also STFU.
The COT is pure mentally ill, self destructive, country destroying poison. 🤬
 

Chew Toy McCoy

Pleb
Site Donor
Posts
7,559
Reaction score
11,811
"’Critical race theory‘ is the perfect name to piss off people who play dipshit anger bingo. All 3 words will set them off." - Trae Crowder. 😂
 

JayMysteri0

What the F?!!!
Posts
6,612
Reaction score
13,752
Location
Not HERE.
https://www.twitter.com/i/web/status/1408835686933925888/
E40wg6wXwAAa5Jq

THIS 👆 all day, EVERYDAY!!

Bonus shittery:
https://www.twitter.com/i/web/status/1408820038044426241/
 
Last edited:

SuperMatt

Site Master
Posts
7,862
Reaction score
15,004
"’Critical race theory‘ is the perfect name to piss off people who play dipshit anger bingo. All 3 words will set them off." - Trae Crowder. 😂

Pretty decent explanation of what CRT is (and isn’t) and also how the right is trying to use it to influence the 2022 elections.
 
Top Bottom
1 2