I actually agree with Clarence Thomas?

SuperMatt

Thread Starter
Elite Member
Vaccinated
PRSI Banned
Posts
2,370
Reaction score
4,954
This version of the Supreme Court, regularly having used shredded precedent to line their birdcages at home, have decided to decline a case in which a victim of rape at West Point was suing the government. Their reason? Something called the Feres doctrine, from a case decided in 1950. I guess they save the overturning of precedent for when they want to keep people from voting.

But Clarence Thomas issued a scathing dissent, which I believe is the first time I agree with him.

 
Top Bottom