This. And it’s not only about restaurants getting squeezed by these services. I for the life of me can’t understand being so lazy that you can’t order on a restaurant’s app or by phone and get your sorry ass in your car and go get it.
Why don’t people just go and pick it up from the restaurant? Everybody thinks if there’s an “app” for something, then it’s automatically good? I’ve never used Uber because I’m not in favor of getting into a run-down Toyota with a complete stranger and hoping they’ll take me where I want to go. There are laws when it comes to Taxis, buses, etc... but do any of them apply to Uber? Not interested in finding out first-hand. My only experience with one of those food delivery companies was when one of their drivers hit my car because he was in such a hurry to deliver some tacos or something. It was a royal pain to deal with the insurance because apparently nobody at postmates has a telephone - only email.
I generally use Lyft, but either service is great for avoiding DUIs. Several times I’ve covered some serious mileage bar hopping. I don’t know where we are at now with pricing but I remember it being way more affordable than attempting the same in a taxi. As far as quality, and this may depend on where you live, but I’ve always gotten a quality car and driver.
Utah School Walks Back Letting Parents Opt Their Kids Out of Black History Month Following Backlash
White people love to ask “Why is everything so political these days?” while proceeding to make everything political. Take, for instance, a group of parents in Utah who wanted to pull their kids from Black History Month lessons. After briefly offering parents an option to opt-out, the Utah school...www.theroot.com
Tanden apologizes for tweets disparaging GOP
President Biden’s nominee to lead the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Neera Tanden, on Tuesday apologized for her past tweets disparaging Republicans.”I regret that language and …thehill.com
A little too blunt for my taste. I guess she means that if it weren't for black pioneers, he would still be called a N', and there's a discrepancy between him embracing BHM and concurrently embracing actions and processes that keep Blacks second class citizens. Yet again, if something needs to be explained, maybe it isn't that witty.
For me NOT blunt enough.
Has he read the constitution?
It's not about that. It's about damage control. It's clear REPs will acquit Trump which will be indefensible, unless you claim your acquittal vote was given because of constitutional issues and not because of Trump being innocent. The result is some wiggle room over how they will spin it on the long run. McConnell is much more dangerous than Trump, because he is far from an idiot.
That was the important part of the dems opening argument, that impeachment has been usually used for individuals no longer in office. I believe the 'r's who are constitutionalist by self quoting, were hoping this was overlooked, as much as 45's legal team that was using the work of a legal scholar out of context.
Trump loyalist Josh Hawley ignores impeachment trial evidence by sitting in gallery to review paperwork
All other 99 senators were on the Senate floorwww.independent.co.uk
Seriously, F this guy with a piece of rusty rebar recently found at the bottom of water where the latest Chevron oil spill occurred in CA.
