The Republican Agenda 2021 and Forward

SuperMatt

Site Master
Posts
7,862
Reaction score
15,004
Abbott also has the Texas National Guard deployed over Christmas to handle this “emergency” at the border. (They’ve been deployed for quite a while now, and it’s quite a terrible saga of mistreated troops, forced away from their families for months because Abbott wants to get political points). One of the deployed soldiers shared the Christmas experience on reddit:



Abbott couldn’t even spare a lieutenant to visit the troops keeping Texas safe from the EMERGENCY BORDER INVASION? You don’t say...
 

lizkat

Watching March roll out real winter
Posts
7,341
Reaction score
15,163
Location
Catskill Mountains
To launch the New Year, Politico Magazine brings us an interview with an outgoing one-term Republican congressman, bearing a message that should be of interest not only to Republicans but to Democrats as well. He's Peter Meijer of Michigan. He was one of the ten Republican House members who voted to impeach Trump after the insurrection of January 6, 2021. He was therefore one of the congress critters Trump was really gunning for in the 2022 Republican primaries.

Trump endorsed a Republican who was an election denier, spreader of conspiracy theories, an anti-feminist and Trump loyalist. The Democrats quietly threw money into the GOP primary at the end, in support of the Trump-backed nominee, figuring he could narrowly win that race but would surely lose the general election.

That was a correct if cynical calculation. Trump's guy won the GOP primary by 3.6% (4k votes) and then lost the general by 13% (43k votes) to a Dem. So now on his way out the door, Meijer unloads on both Trump and the Dems, and he makes some good points.


Wren: You were upset about the Democrats interfering in your primary by boosting your challenger.

Meijer: I don’t know that I’d say upset. The hypocrisy was so transcendent, just the cynicism. I think my rule of thumb is Republicans should probably not pick the person the Democrats want to be the candidate. If the Democratic incumbent is popping a bottle of champagne when they realize who their opponent is going to be, we probably didn’t make the right choice.

Wren: Where do you think the Trump fixation in the Republican Party is headed?

Meijer:
I think in a lot of the media there’s such a Trump fixation. He tapped into something that predated him and that will remain after him. In some places, he delivered, but the positive-to-negative ratio started to shift pretty dramatically, giving into some of the most unchecked impulses. We don’t really have the moderating effect of the water cooler in American life, right, where you’re like, ‘I think this thing is important out there.’ I don’t think there’s a race of lizard people who are controlling our lives.

My frustration is [conspiracy theories] lead folks on the right to go down these rabbit holes and chase their own tails. Meanwhile, some of the really serious, severe things that are critical for us to get ready for the future of the country: competing with China, dealing with our deficit, dealing with entitlement reforms. These are not easy things that we can like, manage in bite-sized chunks.

So much of the energy is ultimately expended down avenues that are just hamster wheels. I think that gives Democrats a tangible advantage. We saw that electorally, when they can at least pretend to be speaking to issues and not seem crazy, even if they are unwilling to change their policy outcomes that are not making those issues better. At least rhetorically, they seem to be coming from a more reality-grounded place.


Yeah. And for the Dems, the operative word and caution there is "rhetorically"....

The Dems lucked out in 2022 primarily because some of the R candidates were off the wall crazy. Some of the R congress critters who were run out of town on a rail in 2022 by Donald Trump over "disloyalty" were good partners to Dems on efforts to push bipartisan legislation across the finish line.

The Democrats will not always be so lucky, and if Republicans like Meijer show up to run again (he has not ruled it out), the results in 2024 may swing back to favor reasonable Rs more heavily, just when the Ds will need to be spending more money on the Senate side, where they have to defend 26 seats.

The Dems need to ensure that the Biden administration's key legislation gets implemented and noted as such in the media between now and primary season 2024. The Ds have just about run out the string of talking a good game and not being able to deliver, or not being able to get so-called "left leaning" media to quit pitching controversy on page one, and start writing more feature articles on policy implementation, like in the business pages.

The Republicans might be on the verge of leaving the Trump era behind, but the media remain entranced by the idea that the MAGA-related circus still sells papers. Otherwise how explain, for example, the most misbegotten headline I've seen the WaPo deliver in awhile, the one over yesterday's take on George Santos, where the headline was "The talented Mr. Santos: A congressman-elect’s unraveling web of deception."

The Dems must be too busy spinning their own take on how they managed to let four blue NY seats in the House flip red in a year when otherwise they did spectacularly well in stemming midterm losses. In the normal course of events that WaPo headline would have been swapped out for something less ludicrous inside of half an hour, just by a few mocking phone calls from administration officials. You can find that mockery in the comments to that piece, but I doubt they're from Biden admin press watchdogs. Maybe they need to quit popping champagne over November results and start reading the newspapers.

And I can't imagine what the Rs make of that headline. One might hope it actually encourages the current RNC to find some George Santos clones and run them in 2024. But somehow I think that Republican voters, at least the ones in NY03, may have turned the page on MAGA nuts before the RNC and the beltway media have done.

We don't know the Republican agenda yet for 2024. They haven't had a platform since 2016 and the ascension of Trump as their standard bearer. But Politico now bothers to interview a Republican official who lost re-election, and not to a Democrat but in the primary, to a wacko member of his own party. There's a message there, for Republicans and "winning" Democrats as well. It's not clear that the 13% winning margin racked up by the Dem who took a Michigan House seat in November 2022 could be replicated in 2024 against a Republican like Meijer instead of the Trump-favored Gibbs. Could be time for Dems to quit celebrating and start trying to ensure they have something for the 2024 show-and-tell that's better than "we almost won the midterms."
 

GermanSuplex

Elite Member
Site Donor
Posts
2,740
Reaction score
6,657
Can’t wait to see what the Legend of Carpetbagger JD Vance is up to. Just saw he’s giving his first interview since being sworn in tomorrow. What is this carpetbagger going to bring to the table, honestly?
 

Chew Toy McCoy

Pleb
Site Donor
Posts
7,578
Reaction score
11,836

From the party of "just enforce the laws that are already on the books" while making sure those departments don't have enough staff to enforce them. First priority is always to bleed dry any agency that could enforce laws against the rich and just work their way down from there. At the other end of this is bloated police budgets because the police generally go after the poor or crimes done by the poor. Just can't have enough of those enforcers.
 

shadow puppet

Certifiable
Posts
1,381
Reaction score
2,686
Location
4th padded cell on the right
Casey Desantis so desperately wants to be Jackie O.
Love Bradley Whitford's comment. Handmaid's Tale viewers will get his "under his 👁️" reference.

Screen Shot 2023-01-05 at 4.22.28 PM.png
 

lizkat

Watching March roll out real winter
Posts
7,341
Reaction score
15,163
Location
Catskill Mountains
Casey Desantis so desperately wants to be Jackie O.
Love Bradley Whitford's comment. Handmaid's Tale viewers will get his "under his 👁️" reference.

View attachment 20603Ke

Definitely auditioning to become our iconic dynasty of the 21st century. Creepy, especially the added feature of the uniformed dudes at the door there. Gives the whole scene a military government sort of vibe.
 

lizkat

Watching March roll out real winter
Posts
7,341
Reaction score
15,163
Location
Catskill Mountains
Can somebody explain to me what the woke military is and what about it needs to be stopped?

Yeah that chorus is getting tiresome... Max Boot has a pretty good column about it in the WaPo (paywall lifted) from last September, but I personally think it started in part as an internal and initially muted pushback in reaction to the US military commanders' immediate and very public rebuff of Trump's initial remarks about "both sides" after the Charlottesville incident.

Then of course some on the right took offense to the ensuing effort by the military to weed out extremists from within and as part of that effort, to educate members of the military about systemic racism and etc.

But as Max Boot pointed out, the main reason that the right is whining about a "woke" military is not so much about all that (although it remains a sore point with morons like Tucker Carlson who never even served in the military). It's about the fact that the military leaders had resisted Trump's efforts to politicize it for deployment to suit his own purposes -- to quell social protests, for instance-- and so to adapt it further to his authoritarian view of the executive branch of US government.

All of these attacks against the military for being too “woke” should be seen as part of the MAGA strategy to harness the armed forces (“the guys with the guns,” as Milley put it) to advance their authoritarian agenda. Blake Masters, the ultra-MAGA Republican Senate nominee in Arizona, has even advocated firing all the generals (“they’re left-wing politicians”) and replacing them with “the most conservative colonels.”

The column goes on to point out that such politicization could still occur, thanks to the ways in which a more right-leaning Senate and a Trump or mini-Trump in the White House could force change at the top of our military.

Unfortunately, there would be little to stop a President Trump or a President Ron DeSantis from doing precisely that as long as the Senate confirms their new generals. A MAGA president could even summon back to active duty loony retired generals such as Flynn or Don Bolduc (the GOP Senate nominee in New Hampshire) and appoint them to senior commands — as long as the Senate consents.

There would be no shortage of MAGA retirees to choose from: 124 retired generals and admirals, including Bolduc, signed an open letter last year that pushed false claims of voter fraud and argued that, under the Democrats, “our Country has taken a hard left turn toward Socialism and a Marxist form of tyrannical government.” If Trump wins in 2024, he could choose his Joint Chiefs from their ranks.

Somewhere around there I got a chill and went out to the kitchen for some more coffee.
 

Chew Toy McCoy

Pleb
Site Donor
Posts
7,578
Reaction score
11,836
Yeah that chorus is getting tiresome... Max Boot has a pretty good column about it in the WaPo (paywall lifted) from last September, but I personally think it started in part as an internal and initially muted pushback in reaction to the US military commanders' immediate and very public rebuff of Trump's initial remarks about "both sides" after the Charlottesville incident.

Then of course some on the right took offense to the ensuing effort by the military to weed out extremists from within and as part of that effort, to educate members of the military about systemic racism and etc.

But as Max Boot pointed out, the main reason that the right is whining about a "woke" military is not so much about all that (although it remains a sore point with morons like Tucker Carlson who never even served in the military). It's about the fact that the military leaders had resisted Trump's efforts to politicize it for deployment to suit his own purposes -- to quell social protests, for instance-- and so to adapt it further to his authoritarian view of the executive branch of US government.



The column goes on to point out that such politicization could still occur, thanks to the ways in which a more right-leaning Senate and a Trump or mini-Trump in the White House could force change at the top of our military.



Somewhere around there I got a chill and went out to the kitchen for some more coffee.


Seems to me most people don't know this and a good reason for that is because a "newscaster" or "journalist" almost never counters with some iteration of "WTF are you even talking about?" when a right winger goes off on some woke tourettes tangent.

Louis CK has a bit about his 5-year-old daughter responding to everything he says with "Why?" to which he responds every time trying to explain each "why" which eventually leads to an existential crisis. That near-toddler is better than most journalists.
 

GermanSuplex

Elite Member
Site Donor
Posts
2,740
Reaction score
6,657
I've got to say, I'm really disappointed in McCarthy. After defending Santos last night, today he all he could muster is "he's got a long way to go to earn back trust".

Look, I didn't want the guy to be Speaker, we all know that. It's one thing to watch the normal weasels who have no shame, but this is a guy who's backbone is eroding in real-time before our eyes, and has been over the last few years. I don't hate him and he actually came to power as the type of conservative guys like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz pretend to be. Cruz and Paul talk good BS about the constitution, but have weak policies and involve themselves in stupid culture wars, and they're partisanship proves their constitutional talk is all BS. McCarthy was the opposite, he had sound fiscal and conservative governing policies, without the freak show the Tea Party and MAGA folks brought with them. I was hoping maybe he'd find some spine or try to who knows what to moderate his party and the house. Nope, Santos is almost like a free gift to him, a chance to at least pretend ethics and integrity matter in his party, and he can't even take that easy opportunity to do the right thing. Watching someone who is a decent person rolling over for the minority of a minority of his caucus is sad to watch, bad for the country, and a perfect example of someone selling their soul to achieve their goals.

The republican party is off to a bad start in this new congress.
 
Top Bottom
1 2