Not really suspicious. Pence had them to. They probably saw what Trump was doing willfully and intentionally, and said “Yeah, make sure I don’t have any of this stuff laying around”.
Which, if Trump had done from the starts, this story would have died. It started out the same as the Biden and Pencd stories - “Trump took classified docs home” were the headlines shortly after he left office. Then a year later there was news the Archives were still going back and forth, then the search warrant hit.
I would also not be surprised if other members of congress and/or current or former officials may have done searches of their own to make sure they were in compliance.
Trump, as usual, thinks he can do wrong, doubles down on his efforts, and now he finds himself in more trouble. And there is mounting evidence that’s exactly what he did… stole the documents, refused to turn them over, ignored and deified subpoenas, lied, and drag an untold number of other people down with him.
He is not in trouble for the mere fact of taking them home.
If Trump, Biden, Pence, both Clintons, Colin Powell (right?) etc all had classified documents stored in places they did not belong, I suspect there are (or were until recently) A LOT of documents out there.
I have mixed feelings on this indictment. In my opinion, in an ideal world, Hillary Clinton should have been prosecuted over her server situation and what appeared to me as blatant obstruction. Therefore, Trump should probably be prosecuted as well.
Since Clinton wasn’t prosecuted, the should Trump not be? I don’t know- I think Trump’s problems rise to another level when you consider the recording, which suggests he was intentionally sharing classified information that he admitted was not psychically declassified to unqualified individuals, which implicated the espionage act. To make things worse, it seems like Trump retained and shared this document in just to smear Mark Milley, which is alarming but not surprising given it’s Trump. And that makes me awfully worried about what other docs Trump had, why he decided to keep them, and what intentions he had.
I guess my question as a non-lawyer is the relationship between classified documents and the Presidential Records Act and it allowing, at least to a degree, the president having the authority to determine what is personal and what is presidential record. The 2012 Judicial Watch vs National Archives over the classification (personal vs presidential) of Bill Clinton’s Taylor Branch interview “sock drawer tape” addressed this, with Clinton retaining his right to the tapes. BUT these tapes were recordings of interviews with an author for a book that just so happened to have captured classified conversions- not explicitly classified documents from other government agencies. I suppose there’s a question as to just how far Trump could push bounds here.
In an ideal world, elites would be prosecuted when they break the law just as normal people would be. At the same time, I can recognize we do not live a perfect world where everyone can be unbiased and there is a danger of these prosecutions, even if 100% legitimate, coming off as politically motivated and the risk of societal conflict and precedence of retaliatory investigations, prosecutions, impeachments, etc. This is especially true when the incumbent administration is prosecuting the leading opposition candidate who happens to be the former president.
The next question is, if Trump is found guilty, what is the punishment? Assuming Trump was not selling secrets or doing something grievously wrong, is a court really going to sentence the former president and primary presidential opponent to prison (for up to 400 years)? I think this depends on what information he had and what he did or intended to do with it. After all, General Petraeus shared classified info with his biographer/mistress who was a reporter, lied to the FBI, and served 0 days in jail.
In my mind, Trump’s case has merit, but how it is handled needs to be done very sensitively to ensure as much legitimacy as possible. I don’t think over prosecuting is wise. After all, I think the worst potential crimes have yet to be addressed- including subverting the electoral process and Trump’s responsibility in 1/6 (particularly promotion of election denial and waiting ours to respond to the riots and Capitol breach).